dimartec LinkedIn Content Plan · Long-Cycle Fintech
6 weeks · 18 pieces · founder voice
Campaign · Built from the Long-Cycle Fintech GEO Playbook

Six weeks of LinkedIn from the long-cycle playbook

Eighteen pieces, sequenced into an arc — from "your green dashboard is lying to you" to "here's the 90-day fix." Written to be posted in your own first-person voice, mixing text posts, carousels, and short-video scripts. Every statistic is drawn straight from the playbook and its primary sources; keep them exact when you post.

18pieces
6weeks · ~3/wk
8text posts
6carousels
4short videos

Formats & cadence

Text single-idea written post, no link in body
Carousel 6–9 slide document post
Short video 45–75s vertical, hook in first 2s

Suggested rhythm: Tue / Wed / Thu each week; drop the video mid-week when reach peaks. Put any link in the first comment, not the post body — LinkedIn suppresses reach on posts with outbound links.

Guardrails (read once before posting)

At a glance

Week 1

The hidden emergency

Open with the uncomfortable truth: the healthy dashboard is hiding a pipeline that's failing to form, on a delay you won't feel for years.

01Text postSource · Introduction

The green dashboard problem

Hook (first line)

The most dangerous number in your fintech is the one that looks healthy.

Angle

ARR booked, churn low, renewals years out — every SaaS metric says "safe." But all those numbers describe the past. None of them tell you the one thing that decides your future: are the buyers who'll form your next book of business actually finding you? In a long-contract business you can be losing the future while the present looks perfect.

Talking points
  • Long contracts don't just protect revenue — they ration your market. If contracts average four years, only ~25% of accounts are even in-play in a given year.
  • The green dashboard isn't evidence you're safe. It's the anesthetic that lets a slow problem grow unnoticed.
Engagement CTA
"If your dashboard is green: when did you last check whether AI recommends you to a buyer whose contract is about to end?"
Visual

Plain text post. Let the reframe carry it.

02Short video · 50–70sSource · Chapter 1

Locked revenue is a countdown, not a moat

Hook (first 2 seconds)

Your three-year contracts feel like a moat. They're actually a countdown — and the clock is set by work you're not doing right now.

Script beats
  1. Hook.
  2. Every contract that protects you today is a clock ticking toward the moment that account re-enters the market.
  3. Here's the trap: if you're invisible in AI today, the buyers who re-market this year don't find you — and you barely notice, because booked revenue carries you.
  4. Two or three years later, older contracts end, the replacement pipeline was never seeded, and now it's a crisis you can't fix retroactively.
  5. Close: "You can't fix a three-years-ago problem today. You can only prevent a three-years-from-now problem — today, while the dashboard's still green."
Stat to cite~25% of accounts in-play per year (4-yr contracts)
Engagement CTA
"Founders in long-contract markets: are you treating locked revenue as a moat, or as a funded runway?"
Visual

Talking head, vertical 9:16, with a simple Year 0 → Year 3 timeline animating on screen.

03Carousel · 7 slidesSource · Chapter 1

Why your pipeline dies on a 3-year delay

Hook (slide 1)

In a long-contract market, cause and effect are years apart. Here's how a pipeline dies silently — and why you won't see it coming until it's too late.

Slides
  • Year 0 — You're invisible in AI. This year's re-market buyers don't find you. You barely notice; booked revenue is safe.
  • Years 1–2 — The pipeline that should've formed never did. Still invisible on the dashboard.
  • Years 2–3 — Older contracts end. The replacement pipeline isn't there — it was never seeded. Now the numbers move. Now it's a crisis.
  • The lag between cause (invisibility now) and symptom (collapse later) is the whole danger.
  • You can't fix it retroactively — only prevent it, while the dashboard is green.
Close (final slide)

Locked revenue is a countdown, not a moat.

Engagement CTA
"Where's your market in this timeline right now? Comment Y0, Y1–2, or Y2–3."
Visual

Three-step timeline carousel — reuse the playbook's lag-timeline styling.

Week 2

Why paid can't save you

Close the obvious escape hatch, then make the case: GEO isn't a tactic, it's your primary channel — and the economics prove it.

04Text postSource · Chapter 2

You can't advertise your way out

Hook

When most companies sense a pipeline dip, they turn on paid ads. If you're a regulated fintech, that escape hatch is welded shut — twice over.

Angle

Two walls. Wall one: your regulator polices the promotion itself — fair, clear, not misleading, approvals, real enforcement (even a LinkedIn post is in scope). Wall two: the ad platforms gate or ban financial advertising regardless — Meta's special-category limits and outright bans, Google's jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction verification. Paid gets slow, restricted, and in some categories simply closed.

Talking points
  • The channel everyone else reaches for when pipeline dips isn't reliably available to you.
  • That's not a reason to despair — it's the reason to build a channel that can't be switched off.
Engagement CTA
"Regulated fintech marketers: how much of your paid budget actually clears both compliance and the platform gates?"
Visual

Text post; optional "two walls" graphic (regulator + platforms).

05Carousel · 8 slidesSource · Chapter 3

GEO: tactic or channel? The difference costs you a decade

Hook (slide 1)

Most fintechs file GEO next to "do some SEO." That single filing decision is the most expensive mistake you can make right now.

Slides (one row of the shift each)
  • Ownership: a content-team task → a named owner accountable to leadership.
  • Budget: leftover, project-based → a core line item, funded as primary acquisition.
  • Goal: "publish AI-friendly content" → share of voice in AI answers → sourced pipeline.
  • Measurement: vanity (traffic, publish count) → leading indicators tied to revenue.
  • Time horizon: one-off campaign → a compounding asset built over years.
  • Board visibility: none → reported as a strategic channel.
Close

A tactic gets a campaign. A channel gets an operating system. For a regulated fintech, GEO is the channel.

Engagement CTA
"Right now, is GEO a tactic or a channel in your org? Reply with which column you're in."
Visual

Two-column "tactic vs channel" carousel — reuse the playbook table.

06Short video · 55–75sSource · Chapter 4

Highest CAC in B2B — and paid only rents attention

Hook (first 2 seconds)

Fintech has the highest customer-acquisition cost of any B2B vertical — about $1,450 — and it's still climbing. Here's why paid makes that worse, and GEO fixes it.

Script beats
  1. Hook.
  2. B2B average CAC is ~$1,200; fintech runs highest at ~$1,450. And B2B acquisition costs rose about 14% through 2025, with Google Ads cost-per-lead near $70.
  3. Paid is rented attention — turn off the spend and the leads stop the same day. You re-buy the same audience forever, at a rising price, on a channel a platform can throttle overnight.
  4. GEO is the opposite: an owned asset. The work compounds — presence begets citations begets more presence — and cost-per-acquisition falls as it matures.
  5. Close: "Paid is a lease. GEO is equity. And the compounding curve needs a head start — start while the dashboard's green."
Stats to cite (keep exact) ~$1,200 avg B2B CAC~$1,450 fintech (highest) +14% through 2025~$70 B2B Google Ads CPL Source: First Page Sage / B2B CAC benchmarks (via Quora).
Engagement CTA
"Is your acquisition cost trending up or down — and is the channel behind it owned or rented?"
Visual

Talking head + on-screen stat cards; optional compounding-vs-treadmill line chart from the playbook.

Week 3

The buyer & the journey

Show the shape of the modern re-market deal: it starts inside an AI answer, runs months, and passes through a committee that's quietly weighing you against "just renew."

07Text postSource · Chapter 5

The starting line moved off your website

Hook

A buyer coming off a four-year contract hasn't shopped your category since before AI could recommend vendors. Guess where they start now.

Angle

The re-market moment — renewal review, new-supplier search, RFP — begins with a question to a machine, not a visit to your site. They build a shortlist before visiting a single website, and by the time an RFP lands they've asked AI about you and your competitors a dozen times.

Talking points
  • Roughly half of B2B software buyers now start research with AI chatbots; 69% use reps mainly to validate what the AI already told them.
  • Being out of date on the market makes the AI's framing disproportionately influential.
Stats to cite~50% start research with AI chatbots69% use reps to validate AISources: G2 (via PR Newswire); Gartner (via Business Wire).
Engagement CTA
"When a locked account re-markets, does the machine name you — or your incumbent competitor?"
Visual

Text post.

08Carousel · 7 slidesSource · Chapter 5

The 5 stages of an AI-first re-market deal

Hook (slide 1)

A returning fintech buyer runs through 5 stages before you even know a deal exists. Here's where you win or lose each.

Slides
  • Stage 1 · Trigger & framing (wk 0–3): be a named vendor in the framing.
  • Stage 2 · Landscape & shortlist (wk 2–8): be in the comparison, described accurately.
  • Stage 3 · Deep evaluation (wk 6–20): supply quotable proof + capture the visitor.
  • Stage 4 · Consensus & business case (wk 12–24): arm the champion to make the switching case.
  • Stage 5 · Selection & procurement (wk 18–26+): de-risk the switch.
Close

Show up once and go quiet, and a months-long evaluation against an entrenched incumbent grinds you out.

Engagement CTA
"Which stage do your deals stall in most? I bet it's Stage 4 — consensus."
Visual

Horizontal timeline carousel with week markers.

09Short video · 50–70sSource · Chapter 6

You're selling to a committee weighing "just renew"

Hook (first 2 seconds)

You think you're selling to a buyer. You're selling to 4–7 people who each ask a different AI a different question — and every one is secretly asking: "is switching even worth it?"

Script beats
  1. Hook.
  2. The functional evaluator asks about capability. The technical owner asks about migration risk. The CFO asks about the cost of switching. Procurement asks "any red flags?"
  3. Different questions surface different vendors — you can be the technical owner's favourite and invisible to the evaluator.
  4. And deals here don't die at "no." They die when consensus to endure the pain of switching never forms, and the account renews by default.
  5. Close: "Generic messaging counters none of them — and does nothing against the incumbent's biggest asset: familiarity."
Engagement CTA
"When you're the challenger, which persona is hardest to win over?"
Visual

Talking head; persona chips popping in as you name each.

Week 4

How the machine works & what to build

The educational core: demystify the mechanism, then point at the single highest-value content most vendors skip.

10Text postSource · Chapter 7

GEO is not SEO with an AI sticker

Hook

If your plan for AI search is to hand it to the SEO team and ask for a keyword plan, you're optimising for the wrong machine.

Angle

In SEO you fight to be a link on a page of options — the buyer still chooses. In GEO you fight to be the answer itself, the name the model says out loud. No position #1, no page two. You optimise for probability, not position.

Talking points
  • Some old SEO habits now hurt you: keyword-stuffing, thin pages, clickbait titles that withhold the answer.
  • Crawlability is the floor, not the strategy.
Engagement CTA
"Be honest: is your GEO plan just your SEO plan wearing a new hat?"
Visual

Text post; link the "GEO is not SEO" explainer in the first comment.

11Carousel · 6 slidesSource · Chapter 7

How an AI decides which brand to name: the 2 doors

Hook (slide 1)

There are exactly two ways your brand ends up in an AI's answer. Neither one is "rank #1 on Google."

Slides
  • Door 1 — Trained-in memory: the model absorbed the web and "just knows" you belong, if the web consistently ties your name to your category.
  • Door 2 — Live retrieval: the model searches mid-answer and quotes the clearest passage it finds. Needs crawlable + genuinely quotable content.
  • Consistency of association is what survives compression.
  • Why it matters here: trained-in memory is how you stay findable through the years your future buyers are still locked in contracts.
Close

Serious GEO works both doors at once.

Engagement CTA
"Which door is your content actually built for right now — memory, retrieval, or neither?"
Visual

Two-door diagram — reuse the playbook's trained-in-vs-retrieval visual.

12Text postSource · Chapter 8

Own the "best alternative to [incumbent]" query

Hook

The single highest-value page a long-contract fintech can publish is the one almost none of them bother to write: "best alternative to [the incumbent]."

Angle

A returning buyer's real queries are comparison and switching queries — "best alternative to X," "how does Y compare," "is it worth switching from Z." These are exactly what a re-market buyer asks, and most vendors under-invest in them. Publish the boring, high-value stuff competitors won't: migration guides, honest comparisons, outcome data.

Talking points
  • Specificity per ICP is how you get named in the narrow, high-intent queries.
  • Track share of voice in AI answers, not organic sessions — it's also your earliest pipeline warning.
Engagement CTA
"Ask an AI 'best alternative to [your biggest incumbent competitor]' — are you in the answer? Screenshot it."
Visual

Text post.

Week 5

Convert & nurture

The money week. The five-minute rule is your hero moment; then the two ideas that decide whether visibility ever becomes revenue — full-funnel activation and the nurture engine.

13Short video · 60–75s · HEROSource · Chapter 10

The most important number in your funnel: 5 minutes

Hook (first 2 seconds)

Contact a web lead within 5 minutes instead of 30 and you're 21 times more likely to qualify it. In a long-contract market, that lead might be your only shot at that account for years.

Script beats
  1. Hook — hit the 21× and 100× hard, on screen.
  2. Source it right: MIT / InsideSales study by Dr. James Oldroyd — 15,000+ leads, 100,000+ contact attempts. Not a McKinsey study — that one doesn't exist.
  3. Why it's life-or-death here: this re-market lead was years in the making; they're comparing you and their incumbent in the same session; and a buyer weighing a disruptive switch reads your response speed as proof of what you'll be like to work with.
  4. Close: "You waited an entire contract cycle for this door to open. Don't answer the lead two days later."
Stats to cite (keep exact) 21× more likely to qualify (5 vs 30 min) 100× more likely to make contact 15,000+ leads · 100,000+ attempts Source: MIT / InsideSales Lead Response Management study (Oldroyd). Not McKinsey.
Engagement CTA
"What's your team's actual median lead-response time? Be honest before you answer."
Visual

Big animated 21× / 100× on screen — the most shareable asset in the campaign. Consider a slightly higher production pass. Vertical 9:16.

14Text postSource · Chapter 9

GEO visibility is a leak, not a channel

Hook

You can win every AI answer in your category and still generate almost no pipeline. Here's the trap most GEO programs fall into.

Angle

Because paid can't run your middle and bottom funnel the way it does for other companies, your one channel has to do full-funnel work — awareness, consideration, capture, nurture, close — or the rare demand drains out at the handoffs. A GEO program that only wins awareness is a bucket with the bottom cut out.

Talking points
  • The failure is always the handoff: awareness→capture, capture→speed, capture→nurture, nurture→close.
  • One channel, one message, one engine, all the way down.
Engagement CTA
"Where does your funnel leak worst — capture, speed, or nurture?"
Visual

Text post; optional funnel graphic.

15Carousel · 7 slidesSource · Chapter 11

Nurture is where long-contract markets are won

Hook (slide 1)

In a market where a perfect-fit buyer might not be free to act for 3 more years, the vendor who stays trusted across the silence wins. That's nurture — and it's the whole game.

Slides
  • The gap between "we met" and "you can buy" is measured in years, not weeks.
  • Job 1 — stay the trusted name across the silent years (GEO holds the machine's memory; nurture holds the human's).
  • Job 2 — sustain presence through the 90–180 day evaluation; deals die from drift.
  • Job 3 — arm the champion to win the internal switching argument.
  • The rule: every touch must be worth the buyer's attention on its own — useful even if they never buy.
Close

When the door opens, you're not competing to be considered — you're the presumptive choice the others must dislodge.

Engagement CTA
"How far ahead do you nurture — this quarter's leads, or the accounts that re-market in 2028?"
Visual

Carousel; reuse the three-jobs / Vendor A-vs-B styling.

Week 6

Sell & start

Land the plane: how you actually win against inertia, the 90-day plan to begin, and the one soft CTA of the whole campaign.

16Text postSource · Chapter 12

Your real competitor is "just renew"

Hook

In a long-contract deal, you rarely lose to another vendor. You lose to "let's just renew — it's easier."

Angle

The buyer already has a solution that works "well enough," and switching is disruptive and career-visible. So selling is de-risking, not persuading: quantify the cost of staying, make inaction the risky choice, shrink the migration mountain, prove it with a small commitment. Your job is to make staying look riskier than switching.

Talking points
  • The deal you lose most often is to "no decision," not a rival.
  • How you sell — speed, precision, follow-through — is read as evidence of what you'll be like as a provider.
Engagement CTA
"What's the most common reason your deals stall — a competitor, or inertia?"
Visual

Text post.

17Carousel · 8 slidesSource · Chapter 13

The 90-day GEO roadmap for long-cycle fintech

Hook (slide 1)

You don't need a year to start. You need 90 days — and you need to start while the dashboard's still green. Here's the plan.

Slides
  • Days 0–30 · Baseline + fast wins: run the prompt audit (incl. "alternative to [incumbent]" prompts), fix your entity footprint, lock your category claim.
  • Days 31–60 · Publish + capture: comparison/switching content, rebuilt landings, a measured 5-minute SLA, design the nurture engine.
  • Days 61–90 · Amplify + nurture + measure: third-party presence, launch horizon-segmented nurture, re-run the audit vs baseline.
  • Lead, don't lag: manage to share of voice, citations, description accuracy, competitor presence — the early-warning dials. Pipeline and win-rate are lagging.
  • Failure mode #1: "the dashboard looks fine, so we'll start later."
Close

Green is exactly when to start.

Engagement CTA
"Where would you start — the audit, the content, or the capture side? Comment 1, 2 or 3."
Visual

30/60/90 timeline + leading/lagging KPI carousel — reuse the playbook styling.

18Text post · the one CTASource · Conclusion

The green dashboard is a warning light

Hook

The firms that will dominate long-cycle fintech aren't the ones with the most locked revenue today. They're the ones treating that locked revenue as a countdown, not a moat.

Angle

Bring the six-week arc home: long contracts hide a pipeline problem on a multi-year delay; you can't advertise your way out; GEO is your primary, un-switchable channel; the economics compound; nurture wins the re-market moment; the sale defeats inertia. The window to act is while the dashboard is green.

The one soft CTA (allowed here)
We wrote the whole thing down — the GEO Revenue Engine playbook for long-cycle fintech, from the long-contract trap to the 90-day plan. Link in the first comment. → the playbook LP + geo.dimartec.co.uk
Talking points
  • "Your pipeline can be dying right now, and because your contracts are long, you won't feel it for three years."
  • Thank the people who engaged across the six weeks — it seeds the comments.
Visual

Text post. Put the playbook link in the first comment, not the body — the only place a link belongs in the whole campaign.

After the 6 weeks

This arc loops. Re-run the highest-performing pieces as fresh angles, turn a carousel that landed into a short video (and vice-versa), and mine your comment sections — the questions people ask become the next round of hooks. When you re-run the prompt audit from piece #12, whatever the machine now says about you (and your incumbent competitors) is a post in itself.